Communication Institute for Online Scholarship
Communication Institute for Online
Scholarship Continous online service and innovation
since 1986
Site index
 
ComAbstracts Visual Communication Concept Explorer Tables of Contents Electronic Journal of Communication ComVista

Article from ejc/rec VIRTUAL COMMUNITY: BOUNDARY CROSSINGS AT HEALTH-RELATED WEB SITES
TheElectronicJournal of Communication / La Revue Electronique de Communication

Volume 11 Number 2, 2001

VIRTUAL COMMUNITY:  BOUNDARY CROSSINGS AT HEALTH-RELATED WEB SITES
 

Sally J. McMillan
University of Tennessee

Abstract. This study explores a sample of 171 health-related Web sites that have potential for virtual community. Qualitative analysis of the Web sites and information provided by the content creators led to identification of four types of Web sites.  Only 11 percent of the studied sites include the two-way communication and high levels of control that are identified in this study as key characteristics of the Virtual Community type of Web site.  The Web-site types identified as Packaged Content, Rich Content, and Virtual Transactions better characterize the remaining sites.  All four of these types have appropriate uses for health communication as well as other forms of computer-mediated communication.  Brief descriptions of representative sites are provided for each of the four types.  In addition, the author discusses potential for each of these types in facilitating the crossing of boundaries between mass and interpersonal communication and between public and private spheres.

A recent analysis of health-related sites on the World Wide Web (McMillan 1998) found that more than half of them might facilitate virtual community.  These sites were created by volunteers and/or non-profit organizations and were more likely than other sites in the sample to be characterized by high levels of interactivity and a communal sense of property among the site creators.  But what does virtual community mean on the Web?  And how is virtual community formed in health-related Web sites?  This study explores those questions by further examining health-related Web sites that were identified as having the potential for virtual community.  Special consideration is given to how those sites facilitate boundary crossing between mass and interpersonal communication and between public and private interests.

Literature Review

Literature related to two primary subjects informs this study. First is the concept of virtual community. Second is health-related use of the Internet.

Virtual Community

The concept of virtual community was popularized by Rheingold (1993) in his book that traces the history of community-oriented, computer-mediated communication. He defined virtual communities as ôsocial aggregations that emerge from the Net when enough people carry on those public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships in cyberspaceö (p. 5). Scholars in the mid- to late-1990s began to examine formally the concept of virtual community. Wellman et al. (1996, p. 213) suggested ômembers of virtual communities want to link globally with kindred souls for companionship, information, and social support.ö Virnoche and Marx (1997, p. 88) described virtual communities as ôencompassing people whose connections to one another are based solely in virtual space.ö They defined virtual space as an electronically constituted place that is created in computer-mediated communication environments.

While the concept of virtual community has moved to center stage in recent years, it is not new. In the early 1990s, Halal (1992, p. 13) offered an optimistic definition: ôThe virtual community transcends mass communication to provide electronically mediated relationships that actually turn the earth into a single global community.ö But the concept of virtual community preceded the 1990s. As early as 1968, Licklider, Taylor and Herbert predicted the existence of computer-linked communities.ôWhat will on-line interactive communities be like? ... They will be communities not of common location, but of common interest.öNearly two decades later, Kiesler (1986) observed that computers were moving past their origins as facilitators of work and beginning to impact on social and cultural structures.

What are the impacts of these emerging virtual communities? Boyte (1989) suggested that the information society created a greater need for community-wide meeting grounds while at the same time common areas all but disappeared from American life. He argued that in traditional societies the common areas created a public sphere that was the center for news, exchanging views, political education, and engaging in debate and discussion about public issues and community problems.

Habermas (1984) suggested that the industrial age marked the beginning of the end for the public sphere. In particular, he blamed mass media with their advertising-based model of financial support for creating a buyable and sellable ôphonyö discourse that displaced the genuine kind. Do computer-mediated environments create a forum for interpersonal communication, as in HabermasÆ idealized public sphere, or for mass communication, which, according to Habermas, was responsible for destroying the public sphere? Some scholars are beginning to suggest that computer-mediated communication confounds scholars who ôremain committed to categories that pose a great divide between direct and mediated communicationö (Cerulo 1997, p. 49). Perhaps it is neither and both.

Regardless of the boundary-crossing nature of communication in computer-mediated environments, questions remain about relationships between virtual community and the public sphere. Do virtual communities further erode the public sphere or reinvigorate it?Moore (1991) questioned whether computer-based communities are ôtrueö communities. He suggested that ôtrueö communities must develop traditions that join the individuals and groups in meaningful ways.

McMillan and Campbell (1996) found there might be cause for concern about the strength of online communities. Their examination of 500 city-based Web sites showed that more than 70 percent of sites represent the commercial sphere. Of remaining sites that did focus on community building, most extend the one-way public information model (Grunig & Grunig 1989) into cyberspace. Relatively few of the Web sites examined in that study included basic two-way communication for facilitating the kind of discourse traditionally found in the ôrealö public sphere. Although many cities have focused on tourism and community development in their Web sites, the Web is not inherently a commercial medium. In fact, the McMillan and Campbell (1996) study did find some notable examples of cities that are using their Web sites to address public issues ranging from homelessness to voter registration.

Some scholars have suggested that it is inappropriate to compare virtual communities either to ôrealö communities or historical manifestations of the public sphere. According to Wellman et al. (1996) computer-supported social networks are ônot just pale imitations of æreal life.Æ The Net is the Netö (p. 231). But what are these social relationships that are developing on the Net? Wellman and his colleagues suggest that virtual communities are simultaneously becoming more global and more local as worldwide connectivity and domestic matters intersect. Virtual communities are unlike ôrealö ones in that they are often partial and transitory. An individual will probably not depend on a single virtual community to provide all the functionality of a traditional public sphere. Instead, he or she gathers bits and pieces of both personal and public information in both interpersonal and mass communication environments found in multiple computer-based communication environments.

This partial and transitory nature of virtual community poses potential problems. Turkle (1997) suggested that individuals must learn to adapt to a social environment characterized by multiplicity and flexibility. She said ôwe are dwellers on the threshold between the real and the virtual; we are unsure of how to cycle between our online and off-line livesö (p. 80). Cerulo (1997, p. 55) suggested this type of uncertainty should be embraced not feared: ôWhen we blur the boundaries that distinguish private thought from shared experience, when we adjust the lines that separate past, present, and future, or fact from fiction, we extend the confines of what we call reality.ö

Health Communication

Health-related sites on the World Wide Web are an important starting place for conceptualizing how public spaces and virtual communities might form in computer-based communication systems. Health and health-related subjects have played a central role in the early development of other communication systems. For example, McMillan (1999) noted that patent medicines were among the first products to advertise in newspapers and that makers of health-related products were among the first sponsors of radio programs with a mass audience. Health-related content is also playing an important role in the development of computer-mediated communication. It is one of the fastest growing topic areas in cyberspace (Fisher, 1996). Researchers have also found that health sites are frequently visited and have potential for building communities (Pingree et al., 1996).>

Fotsch (1996) reported that computer-mediated communication has been used in health care for about 20 years as a research, educational, and informational tool. Most health care professionals trained after 1980 have investigated medical- or health-related topics via online services such as Medline, Grateful Med, and similar electronic databases. Werner (1996) reported that 90 percent of academic doctors use the Internet and that academic medical centers were among the first health care institutions to establish a presence on the Web. Health-related uses of the Web have expanded beyond academe. Medical manufacturing companies, health-care institutions and pharmaceutical companies are leaders in developing commercial uses of the Internet. Meyer (1996) suggested the primary purposes of most health sites on the Web are consumer education and marketing.

Larkin (1996) reported a growing interest in obtaining health information online. This is viewed by many as a supplement to, or substitute for, traditional medical counsel. Vaz (1999) reported that an estimated 22 million adults used the Internet in 1998 to seek medical information. However, Larkin (1996) warned, ômany con artists have penetrated the Webö (p. 21).Business Week recently reported that superb e-mail forums for medical professionals exist side-by-side with ôabject quackeryö (Gross, 1999).

Villalon (1999) reported that the Internet is changing the way managed care companies market their health plans, stay competitive, and communicate with their members. In 1999, health-related e-commerce blossomed. Parks (1999) reported that Seattle-based Soma.com became the first full-service virtual pharmacy in January of 1999 but was soon followed by other full-service e-pharmacies.

Health-related Web sites offer a challenge to traditional relationships between the private and the public.Certainly health is a personal and private issue, but public health concerns can impact the lives of thousands. Furthermore, medical professionals have long staked their reputation and income on their private store of expert knowledge that needs to be carefully guarded from an uninformed public who might make poor health choices without the advice of experts. The Web, with its ready access to virtually unlimited information sources, threatens this traditional ôexpertö status of medical professionals.

The medical profession has expressed both optimism and concern about online communication as a supplement or substitute for traditional medical counsel. Kassirer (1995) provided an optimistic perspective on ways that interactive computer systems are being developed to assist with diagnosis and treatment. But Forderaro (1995) observed that many health-care professionals charge that the Internet can be a repository of misleading information. Orvell (1995) also took a pessimistic view. He suggested the combination of managed care, which is already focused on cost saving, and ôcybermedicine,ö which can further increase automation and reduce costs, might lead to an unfortunate situation in which patients are reduced to consumers and medical care becomes simply a product. Interactive computer systems may then become a delivery system by which diagnosis and treatment are provided. Orvell expressed concern that such a market-driven system would deliver information that may not benefit the patient.

Some Web sites benefit both patients and health professionals. McNeil (1996) reported the National Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations and the National Cancer Institute, created an Internet site that provides women with information about clinical trials in which they can participate.A goal for the site is to encourage high-risk women to participate in such trials. Another positive example of use of the Web for establishing communication between health-care providers and patients is found in computer-based support systems developed to address HIV infection and AIDS (Pingree et al., 1996).

Not all health-related Web sites are equally likely to foster virtual community.  Virnoche and Marx (1997) suggested that volunteerism is at the heart of virtual community. McMillan (1998) found that sites created by non-profit organizations and/or volunteers were more likely than other sites to utilize two-way communication tools and that creators of those sites were more likely than others to believe information is a community resource rather than a private commodity. By contrast, those least likely to use interactive techniques and most likely to seek financial gain from online information were for-profit corporations that created Web sites to support their corporate goals. Thus sites that invite individuals to voluntarily participate in an interactive dialogue at or through the sites seem most likely to foster virtual community.

Method

Two research questions guided this study of health-related Web sites. First: Are there boundaries between mass and interpersonal communication at these sites? And second:How do public and private spheres interact and overlap at these sites?

Sample/Procedure

The Web sites analyzed in this study are drawn from a subset of an earlier study of health-related Web sites (McMillan 1998).That study drew a random sample of sites from the Yahoo! directory of health-related topics. Yahoo! is a topically arranged electronic directory of Internet content. A total of 1,050 sites was selected randomly from the nearly 15,000 health-related sites listed by Yahoo! in early 1997.After removal of duplicates, non-functioning Web addresses, and bad e-mail addresses, the valid sample size was 834 Web sites.Surveys were sent via e-mail to electronic addresses found at Web sites.A reminder e-mail message was sent one week after the initial message.A total of 395 completed surveys were returned via e-mail resulting in a response rate of 47.5 percent.

A central question in that earlier study was the source of funding for content.Of the 395 respondents analyzed, 202 reported that the content of their Web site was supported by volunteer efforts and/or funding from non-profit organizations. The majority of these sites (76 percent) spent less than $10,000 per year (in dollars and/or volunteer time) in creating and maintaining the content of their sites. Furthermore, these sites were more likely than others in the sample to exhibit high levels of interactivity and creators of these sites were more likely than their counterparts at other sites to indicate that information should be freely available on the Internet. Thus, these 202 sites seemed to be a good starting point for examining virtual community on the Internet.

Approximately one year after the initial study, the researcher returned to each of the 202 sites identified above.Most of the sites were still operating and many appeared to be very similar in concept, purpose, and content a year later.However, 31 of the sites were no longer operating. Within this category there seems to be about a 15 percent attrition rate annually. The 171 sites that remained after one year formed the sample for the current study.

Analysis

Analysis of these sites is reported below.The researcher used two procedures. First, survey responses provided by site creators were reviewed with primary attention on the statement of purpose for each site. Second, each of the 171 Web sites was examined. The primary focus of this examination was on the ôhome pageö (first screen) of the Web site. These home pages were printed for each site. The goal in using these two procedures was to gain a preliminary understanding of how virtual community might be implemented in health-related Web sites. Because of the exploratory nature of this study and the relative paucity of literature that defines and explains virtual community, the researcher believed it was more important to qualify virtual community rather than to quantify it.

After immersion in the statements of purpose and the basic content of each Web site, the researcher identified four ôtypesö that provide a system for categorizing these sites. These types represent multiple approaches to the blending of mass and interpersonal communication. Table 1 summarizes distribution of the sites in these four types.

Table 1. Four Types of Health-Related Web Sites
 
 
Site Types
Sites in Sample
Packaged Content
77 (44%)
Rich Content
39 (23 %)
Virtual Transaction
37 (22%)
Virtual Community
18 (11%)

These four types represent different forms of interactive communication.Two key dimensions help to define the types. The first is direction of communication. As noted earlier, two-way communication is an important aspect of virtual community, but not all Web sites fully utilize the two-way communication capabilities of the medium.

The second key dimension is control over the communication process.Virtual communities should allow all participants to both send and receive messages.Centralized control should be low and all participants should be able to exert some control over their communication experience. Again, however, not all Web sites allow this level of participant control. Figure 1 graphically illustrates the way in which direction of communication and control of the communication experience define these four types.

All of the 171 sites analyzed in this study were examined in terms of both of the key dimensions illustrated in Figure 1 (direction of communication and receiver control).Four other dimensions were also considered in the analysis:time sensitivity, sense of place, activity, perceived communication goals.

Sites that facilitate virtual community should allow visitors multiple ways to communicate at times that are convenient for them.  They should also create a sense of place so that visitors have a virtual public sphere in which to interact.Virtual communities should allow communicators to be active rather than passive.They should also be based more on goals of exchange of information and ideas rather than on persuasive or transactional communication goals.
 

The four types described above are used to organize the 171 sites analyzed for this study.As noted in the method section, both the content of the sites and the site managersÆ responses to survey questions were used to help organize these sites.While all of the sites were characterized by funding from volunteer and/or non-profit funding sources, not all were characterized by the Virtual Community type.

Packaged Content

The largest group of sites (44 percent) may be best categorized as Packaged Content.These Web sites seem to be little more than a translation of marketing messages to a new medium.Some are like brochures, others are like newsletters, but all seem characterized by one-way communication that is ôpushedö from the organization to its target markets.They have limited sensitivity to the time needs of site visitors, a limited sense of ôplace,ö limited user activity, and persuasive goals.These sites do not facilitate conversation; they carry marketing oriented messages, but they donÆt actually sell.Brief profiles of three characteristic sites are provided below.Because respondents were promised anonymity, site names and addresses are not provided.Instead, pseudonyms are used for each site.

Science Center. The Science Center is a research division of a medical program at a major state university.The stated purpose of this specific site is four-fold: ô(1) To provide colleagues, the public and prospective students and post-docs information about our department, its faculty, and our research.(2) To provide our staff and colleagues up-to-date information concerning seminars and conferences at our site. (3) To provide starting points for our staffÆs Internet research needs (primarily bibliographic and molecular biology sources). (4) To provide a source for information about the surrounding rural communities.ö

The survey respondent indicated the cost of developing and maintaining the content at the site was between $5,000 and $9,999 annually.Of that, 10 percent was paid for by the organization. The remaining 90 percent was in-kind donation of Science Center volunteers.Three people maintain the site û one computer specialist and two scientists.The site includes a hit counter indicating that the site had been visited more than 18,000 times in the approximately 2 1/2 years it had been in operation. The Center may have saved itself the cost of printing more than 7,000 brochures per year.

The Science Center Web site has six primary subdivisions: Home, About, Faculty, Training, Seminars, and Links.While it does have some links to personal faculty pages, for the most part this Web site does little to facilitate two-way communication with visitors.It seems designed to be an attractive promotional piece of the type often created by marketing communication departments.Traditionally, it would have probably been produced as a small booklet.Digitally, it has become a Packaged Content Web site.

Medical Society. The Medical Society Web site is operated by a state association representing the medical profession. It combines the organizationÆs traditional newsletter with a recruiting brochure, and other marketing communication tools.The stated purpose of this site is to:ôProvide state physicians with timely information regarding the activities and programs of the Society and an easy link to the WWW.ö

The survey respondent indicated that 100 percent of the cost of creating and maintaining content at this site is absorbed as a cost of doing business for the non-profit organization.Annual costs were reported to be in the $5,000 to $9,999 range.One person is responsible for maintaining the site û the Director of Professional Education and Community Affairs.This person is probably the organizationÆs marketing communication specialist who creates marketing materials in ôthe real worldö and then packages the content to be ôshoveledö onto the Web.

Primary categories of content at this site are: About, From the President, Legislative News, Medical Links, Member Services, Subsidiaries, Specialty Societies, and Staff/E-mail.

While the final category does provide a simple link back to the creator of the information, the communication is primarily one way.There is no bulletin board on which members can write comment about services, no newsgroup for specialty societies, and no way for members to post news of their own.

Service Organization.The Service Organization site is run by a group of volunteers who are members of an organization that provides support to individuals with a specific health problem.

  The stated purpose of this site is:ôWe attempt to carry our message of recovery to others through our Web site and also provide information to professionals in various fields.ö

The survey respondent indicated that the cost of creating and maintaining content at this site is $1,000 to $4,999 annually and that the volunteers who work on the site absorb all of those costs.Two individuals have primary responsibility for the site, but they work with other members around the globe to provide translations of the information into languages as diverse as Russian and Spanish.

Perhaps of the three sample Web sites profiled as Packaged Content, this Service Organization site comes closest to virtual community. It is a volunteer effort by people who have benefited from the services the organization provides.In a way, they seem to be posting this site as a sort of tribute to the organization that has helped them.But while it represents a unique global use of the Web, the communication is still primarily one-way.An e-mail link provides a feedback loop to the primary content creators.But there are no other ways for individuals who are interested in or who have been served by this organization to share their experiences online.

Crossing Boundaries.While one may question whether Packaged Content sites are good representations of virtual community, there is no doubt they do provide examples of boundary crossings.

  Packaged Content sites are characterized by one-way communication.The Web provides a new medium for disseminating messages that have in the past been ôbroadcastö to mass (or at least relatively large) audiences via brochures, newsletters, and other traditional communication forms.But many of these sites also include a relatively strong feedback loop that may be more characteristic of interpersonal communication than mass communication.All of the sites in this sample include an e-mail address that was used for sending a survey to site creators.The fact that someone responded to the survey indicates that creators of these sites are willing to participate in a two-way, interpersonal style of communication.

In approaching the public and private domains, these Packaged Content sites seem to be characterized by ôpublic name, private gain.öOne of the primary purposes of these sites is to promote the name (and as a corollary the nature) of the organization. Making the name public is seen as good publicity.But the benefit of the publicity almost always returns to the organization û it achieves a private gain in terms of donations, membership, participation in programs, or other transactions between the organization and its target publics.Nevertheless, these Web sites do not provide a ôplaceö for this transaction to occur.They provide few two-way communication links.They donÆt even provide services as simple as an online application form.To become involved with these organizations, the individual must make a physical connection in the ôreal world.ö

Rich Content

The second-largest group of Web sites (23 percent) may be best categorized as Rich Content.These sites pack a great deal of information into an electronic format.They are often searchable and/or provide carefully structured content.These sites are less like traditional communication vehicles and more like databases, library catalogs, and other reference tools.Communication at these sites is still primarily one-way.

  But rather than being from sender to receiver, as in the Packaged Content sites, it is one-way communication from the receiver (site visitor) to the sender (site creator).Receivers ôpullö the information they seek from the sites.Organizations and/or individuals create and update the sites at times that are convenient for them.Rich Content sites are information oriented and do not create much of a sense of ôplaceö for the visitor.Brief profiles of three characteristic sites are provided below.

 
Disease Education.The Disease Education site focuses on liver disease and is hosted by a major medical school.The stated purpose of the site is: ôTo educate the public and heath professionals about liver diseases.ö
 
The doctor who edits and produces the site indicated that he does ôeverything: content, updates, putting on files, etc.öHe wrote that this is completely a volunteer effort on his part, but declined to translate his volunteer time into an annual cost of creating and maintaining the content. He identified himself as an assistant professor.One wonders if, perhaps, this form of editing and producing is now, or ever will be, considered as a ôpublication.ö In the publish or perish world of academia, in which an assistant professor must gain recognition for his publications if he hopes to achieve promotion and/or tenure, how much is the electronic compilation of a topical review or annotated bibliography worth?

The site includes a search engine and a help screen.It is structured almost like an annual review of significant research on liver disease except that it is updated almost daily rather than annually and it is searchable by key word.In addition to the search engine, the site contains a ôtable of contentsö which includes alphabetical listings on all of the categories of liver disease covered in the site, information about laboratory tests for liver diseases, an annotated bibliography of current liver-specific research, and links to related sites.

Health Association. In many ways, the Health Association site described here is similar to both the Medical Society and Service Organization sites described earlier. All three are non-profit organizations, all three are service-oriented, and all three base at least part of their business model on membership. But unlike Medical Society and Service Organization Web sites that were oriented primarily to Packaged Content, the Health Association Web site is oriented to disseminating information. The survey respondent wrote that the purpose of the site is to:ôprovide information for people with diabetes and for professionals involved in diabetes research and diabetes care.ö

Three people are responsible for the content at the site:a Systems Coordinator, a Publications Manager, and a Publications Assistant.The organization spends $5,000-$9,999 on this site annually.This site seems to be based on a public information model in which an organizationÆs mission includes dissemination of information.

The opening page of the site begins with a link to a section on ôDiabetes A-Z.ö The site also includes a search engine and a site index, and further subdivides the site into information for professionals and individuals. Prior to the advent of the Web, organizations such as this may have produced directories or information books. The organization may still publish those books. Job titles suggest at least two of the three individuals producing the Web site come from publishing backgrounds.But, the Web site has the added benefit of providing search and indexing tools which make information easy to find.

Information Aggregator. The Information Aggregator site is typical of many of the health-related Web sites in this sample that were created by individuals. This site is hosted by a university, but the site address suggests that the individual is a student. Commercial online services and smaller Internet service providers host other similar sites.This site, and many like it, is primarily an attempt to provide some organization and structure to third-party information.In this case, the site provides links related to eating disorders. The survey respondent indicated the purpose of this site is to: ôEducate people on eating disorders. Give people with interest in the subject an easy way to find their way to various information.ö

The site creator wrote that she spends less than $1,000 per year on creating the content of the site and the only source of funding is her volunteer effort. In addition to the Rich Content she provides at the site, the author also provides personal information on her own struggles with eating disorders and her motivations for making the site.While the site does have a more personal tone than the other two types of Rich Content reviewed above, it remains primarily a one-way communication vehicle.The creator has provided information resources from which the viewer can pick and choose.

The site includes a lengthy table of contents. Every item in the table of contents is a link to information. Some of the links are to Web sites for related associations, therapists, and centers. Other links connect to promotional materials about books, videos, and catalogs on the subject. And yet other links take the viewer to online articles about eating disorders.

Crossing Boundaries. These sites are more ôuser-drivenö than Packaged Content sites, but they still rely primarily on one-way communication. Thus, it seems inappropriate to apply either the virtual community or interpersonal communication label to them. But they are not really like mass communication either.Rather than receiving a single message, each visitor to the site customizes the information that he or she retrieves. Most observers would probably classify the communication in these sites more in the realm of information science than either interpersonal or mass communication. But even that category is not discrete.Tools such as e-mail links cross the boundary into interpersonal communication. And many of these sites include elements, such as newsletters, that are reminiscent of mass communication.

In approaching the public and private domains, Rich Content sites seem characterized by the concept of ôpublic service, private use.ö The site creators are providing a public information service. In some cases, such as Health Association, there may be some hope that this public information will eventually bring some gain to the organization.But, for the most part these organizations seem to be providing this information for the private use of individuals who have personal and/or professional reasons for seeking out information on a specific subject. In many ways these sites seem to provide individuals with new forms of public ôlibrariesö which they can customize to meet their own private needs. Both the posting and the retrieving of the information are solitary activities.With the exception of a few e-mail links and biographies of the content creators, the individuals who create information know little about each other.

Virtual Transaction

The third-largest group of sites (22 percent) may be best categorized as Virtual Transaction. These Web sites are designed to facilitate some sort of transaction between the site creator and the visitor. They encourage two-way communication in the context of a virtual ôplaceö where these transactions occur. The transaction may be monetary either in the sense of purchasing a product or service or in the sense of soliciting a donation. In some cases the transaction may be oriented to volunteerism or education.The key is that the Web site itself facilitates some type of transaction and utilizes two-way communication in the process. However, even though two-way communication occurs, the sender retains primary control over the communication. The sites are designed to make transactions easy for the visitor. They facilitate timely, low-effort communication. Brief profiles of three characteristic sites are provided below.

 
Online Educator. The Online Educator site offers a course of programmed instruction about cholesterol. The course is designed so that it can be taken ôfor funö by anyone or for continuing education units by health professionals. The person who completed the survey about this site indicated that the purpose was to:ôeducate on cholesterol levels and help reduce cholesterol.ö

 
Two individuals work on this site û a health educator and a professional programmer.They identify themselves as a non-profit organization and indicate that all of the costs of creating the site are covered by their volunteer efforts and that they spend less than $1,000 per year in creating and maintaining the content of the site.The usage counter at the end of the site indicates that close to 70,000 people have visited the site.

The site offers small blocks of information followed by questions directly related to that information. Site visitors can select from a list of possible answers to each question. If their answer is correct, they are congratulated. If they are wrong, the computer provides the correct answer. At the end of the course, a summary of performance is provided and they are offered the opportunity to apply online for CEU credits and indicate where the bill (for $15) should be sent.Once the bill is paid, a certificate is issued for the credits. This site offers a type of two-way communication.As visitors answer questions, the computer immediately responds to tell them if they have selected correctly. There is also a link back to the site creators that facilitates a financial transaction.In essence, this site creates a ôplaceö for an individual to receive a virtual continuing education.

Herbal Product.The Herbal Product site offers product information and an ordering opportunity for herbal nutritional products.The creator of this site wrote that the primary purpose for the site is: ôto sell herbal health and nutrition products.ö

The site creator is an independent distributor of products that areô100% Herbal Nutritional Products made from all natural extracts/compounds.NOT laboratory synthesized copycats of nature.ö He wrote that he ôdoes it allö in terms of Web site development.He considers the development of content to be a ôno-costö item. The only cost he associates with the site is the purchase of space on the computer of an Internet service provider.

This site contains very few graphics. In a text-heavy format, it promotes products. One sometimes feels that reading the Web site is like reading a full-page, small-type magazine infomercial. The few graphic images that are included at the site are small, bright calls to action, often in the form of elaborate fonts. While this site incorporates some aspects of both Packaged Content and Rich Content, it differs from both of those types by adding transactional capability. Not only can the site visitor get detailed information about the products couched in promotional language, but he can also buy products at the site. The site adds another interesting implementation of two-way communication with a guest book. Not surprisingly, many of the entries in this guest book are testimonials from users of the products. One wonders if the guest book entries are either solicited or edited. Or is it just coincidence that these user messages are consistent with the infomercial testimonial format?

Volunteer Services. The Volunteer Services site features an agency that provides services to developmentally disabled people and families of children with AIDS. A family camp is the primary focus of the site.The stated purpose of the site is to give site visitors ôan opportunity to volunteer.ö

This site is currently maintained by one person û the agencyÆs information services manager. The creation and maintenance of the content at the site costs between $1,000 and $4,999 annually.

While much of the site is structured like a brochure describing the camp, this site departs from the traditional Packaged Content format by prominently displaying an application form for volunteering services at the next family camp session. The Volunteer Services site offered a simple online form that helped to create a ôplaceö for involvement. Visitors read about the service offered and their hearts are warmed. The online form makes it easy to commit.And if an immediate dialog can be initiated by return e-mail, a transaction may be more likely to occur.

Crossing Boundaries.Virtual Transaction sites may have some elements of community. Their communication is two way, they create a sense of place, and they are sensitive to the time needs of visitors. But within the Virtual Transaction environment there is still a ôprime senderö who initiates the communication and who has the most to gain from a transaction. It seems that these sites are less focused on community and more on marketplace. In Virtual Transaction sites, one finds some elements of both mass and interpersonal communication. Certainly the tools, such as online order forms, used for facilitating the transaction are both two-way and interpersonal. But elements of mass communication seem evident as well. For example, the detailed product information found in the Herbal Product site is very much like the mass-media form that has been labeled ôinfomercial.ö

In approaching the public and private domains, these Virtual Transaction sites seem to be characterized by the concept of ôpublic place, private deal.ö The creators of the content have found cyberspace to be a viable public place to set up shop.Anyone can ôexamine the merchandise.ö This examination may take the form of a ôtrial,ö as in the Online Educator example, or detailed product/service information as in the Herbal Product and Volunteer Services examples. But the deal occurs in private. In fact it is the fear about how well that privacy will be maintained that makes some people reluctant to participate in transactions in the virtual marketplace. Somehow, handing a credit card to a waiter who takes it away and could charge thousands of dollars to the card before returning it to the table is less threatening than providing the credit card number to a virtual vendor on a secured Internet server. The waiter has a face. The transaction is occurring in a public place where others may see him charging things on your card. The virtual vendor is faceless. He may not even exist for any purpose other than ruining your credit. And perhaps the even greater threat is the ôhackerö who may try to intrude on private transactions. These faceless thieves seem to be far more threatening than purse snatchers or other figures in the public space who can only steal a limited number of purses in a day and who can later be identified in a police line-up.

Virtual Community

The smallest group of sites (11 percent) seems to have earned the Virtual Community classification. These Web sites facilitate strong two-way communication. Tools that help build community include newsgroups, bulletin boards, chat rooms, pen pal matching services, and user-created content areas. These sites also allow site visitors to be active participants in the community and have a great deal of control over their visiting experience. The sites facilitate information exchange in a virtual place and at times that are convenient for members of the community. The key to these Web sites is that they are flexible and in constant flux.While one person (or a group of people) may be responsible for creating the virtual place, the visitors to the site are responsible for building the community. Without multiple contributions, these sites are meaningless. An empty chat room is useless. A pen pal service for one is non-functional. Brief profiles of three characteristic sites are provided below.

 
Newsgroup Front Page. The Newsgroup Front Page site is maintained by a doctor at a major medical school. It serves primarily as an organizational tool for e-mail based newsgroups. The site provides an overview of issues related to skin cancers. But its primary function is to inform people about how to get signed up for the appropriate newsgroups related to their own diseases or concerns. The site also provides a gateway to a chat room. The stated purpose of this specific site is simple: ôpatient benefit, interaction.ö
 
The doctor who maintains the site indicated that he is the only person responsible for ôbuildingö the cyber place. He is an Assistant Professor of Medicine and said that his volunteer time and effort are the only means of support for the site. He estimated total cost of maintaining content of the site at less than $1,000 annually. While he does not moderate chat sessions, he does indicate that the chat room is most likely to be active from 9-11 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. This suggests that he may ôlurkö in the chat room during hours that he is not teaching at his east coast medical school. He also does not moderate the newsgroups. The Web site includes a disclaimer about medical information that may be found in the newsgroup postings. 

Sites such as this one have few parallels in the ôreal world.ö Some links from this page provide the kind of information a skin cancer patient might get from booklets provided by a doctor, but information is peripheral to why people visit the site. The newsgroups are central. At these groups individuals can read and share information with people who share a non-place-based community. The ability to get first-hand, experiential knowledge from a globally located group of patients suffering from similar diseases can not be facilitated by traditional mediated or interpersonal communication.

Virtual Playground. The Virtual Playground site is for children who suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In the purpose statement, the survey respondent indicated this site ôfocuses on the people behind the illness, not the illness itself.ö

Large portions of the site are dependent on those people behind the illness to create the content. Three volunteers develop the Web site: a Web Master, an Editor, and a Correspondent.Estimated cost of volunteer time is less than $1,000 annually.

The site includes multiple information-oriented sections. But the central elements of the site give children active and interactive opportunities. For example, the Creative Minds page is a place for kids suffering from CFS to post poems, essays and any other artistic expressions. A bulletin board lets kids respond to or start topical discussions. The People Page provides multiple ways to connect with other ôsick kidsö including chat and discussion groups. Additionally, an Activity Center provides these young sufferers of CFS with ideas about fun ôlow energyö activities and includes a way for kids to post ideas of their own. This site has a newsletter that reads much like the newsletters at Packaged Content Web sites. It also has well-organized, in-depth, links to information typical of Rich Content sites. But by adding a variety of places where children can participate it goes beyond both Packaged Content and Rich Content. This site creates a kind of virtual playground û a place that is an online community for children who do not share a geographical location but do share a physiological condition. 

Online Support Group. The Online Support Group provides a meeting place for women who are trying to conceive, who are pregnant, or who are new mothers.The site creator, a woman who recently had her first child, wrote that she created the site ôto provide a personal record of my pregnancy and now parenting issues, and to provide support for other pregnant women.ö

Two people run this site û the new mother is primarily responsible for the site and her brother assists her. The woman is a marketing analyst by profession and her brother has experience in Web site development. She reports spending less than $1,000 annually in volunteer time to create and maintain the content of the site.

The site is amazingly well designed for an ôamateurö production. It includes a professional-looking logo and menu bar, fast-loading photographs, and text that is laid out in an easy-to-read format. It includes a pen pal page on which women can provide information about themselves and be matched up with other women who are at the same stage of trying to conceive, pregnancy, or new motherhood. The site also includes links to other pregnancy-related information on the Web, has a photo gallery of new babies, and runs periodic surveys (with instant results) on pregnancy-related issues.In essence this site provides a womenÆs support group.

Crossing Boundaries. As noted earlier, the sites reported here seem to typify Virtual Community. Not only is the communication two way, but also these sites foster a sense of place where individuals can participate.While there may be a ôprime senderö who laid the foundation for the site, he/she often takes a relatively passive role in the ongoing development of the site. The site is built by the community. These sites seem to focus on interpersonal communication as evidenced in newsgroups, chat rooms, and other forums for interactive communication. But this is not ôtypicalö interpersonal communication.As Cerulo (1997) noted, scholars studying interpersonal communication have long assumed co-presence of participants.Participants in Virtual Communities not only lack co-presence in space, but they may also carry on ôconversationsö that lack co-presence in time.Furthermore, all members of the community can usually join in these conversations that can turn the context from personal to communal. This ômass interpersonalö form has been described by Rheingold (1993) as ômany-to-many communication.ö

In approaching the public and private domains, these Virtual Community sites seem to be characterized by the concept of ôpublic sphere, private service.ö All of these sites do seem to create a public place for discourse. But the subjects discussed in these places are more personal and private than general and public. This is not meant to suggest that people who suffer from diseases, or women who are bearing and rearing children, are unimportant. They and their concerns are important.But that importance is at a personal level rather than a public-life level.

The private service orientation of these Virtual Community Web sites may be unique to the health communication domain.While public health is an important topic, most individuals tend to view health issues from a very personal perspective û public health only becomes critical when it has personal impacts.It is quite possible that in other subject areas (e.g. political communication), Virtual Community sites might foster a public sphere and provide public service.

However, despite their private orientation, these Virtual Community health-oriented Web sites are very effective at producing public places; most of them spend very little on content development. Once a cyber place has been created and people who share the interest represented by that site have found it, a community can begin to form. That community is what breathes life into the site.The community sustains itself.
 

Discussion

What does Virtual Community mean?How is it manifested in health-related Web sites?This study suggests some early answers to those questions.
 
Virtual Community sites are highly interactive allowing for both two-way communication and a great deal of control over the communication experience. They are also sensitive to the time needs of their visitors and create a sense of place. They foster active participation among visitors and they are built around goals of sharing and mutual understanding rather than transaction or persuasion.

 
An encouraging finding from this study is that these sites donÆt have to be expensive to build. Among this sample of 171volunteer and non-profit health sites, only 24 percent of sites spent more than $10,000 on developing site content.Packaged Content sites, which actually have the least interactive features, were most likely to cost more than $10,000 (28 percent of sites). This may suggest that the organizations that create these promotional sites are investing heavily in ômarketing communication.ö But they are not investing in the kinds of features that add two-way communication, receiver control, or other forms of interactivity to their sites. By contrast, only 19 percent of Virtual Community sites invested more than $10,000 in creation of content at their sites.With less money invested in the content of the sites, they may be less ôslick.ö But site creators have focused their energy and resources on making the sites interactive.

Among this sample of health-related Web sites, it would seem that purpose of the site is more important than the resources available in determining whether or not the site fosters Virtual Community. When site creators had promotional purposes, they were most likely to build Packaged Content sites. When their goals were related to disseminating information, they were most likely to build Rich Content sites. When they wanted to facilitate transactions such as e-commerce or solicitation of volunteers, they were most likely to build Virtual Transaction sites. And when they wanted to facilitate interaction among like-minded individuals they were most likely to build Virtual Community sites.

Health-related Web sits that seem to foster Virtual Community include newsgroups, chat rooms, pen pal lists, and user-created content. They also create a sense of ôplace.öExamples of these places include global bulletin boards, virtual playgrounds, and online support groups. The sense of place is one of the most defining, yet hardest to quantify, aspects of these sites. The places found in this sample tend to resemble a public sphere more than a public market. Within this public sphere, it seems that there is a place for multiple forms of both interpersonal and mass communication.ôConversationsö can be joined by anyone who is interested. Furthermore, some Virtual Community sites include newsletters and other tools that are reminiscent of mass communication.

But what of the 89 percent of these sites that did not seem to typify Virtual Community? Should they be dismissed as inadequate? No .Rather, what this sample reveals is that individuals and non-profit organizations can utilize the World Wide Web in many ways. This new form of computer-mediated communication enables many forms of boundary crossings.For those who develop Packaged Content sites, the Web provides a new distribution channel for mass communication that also facilitates some interpersonal linkages. This new medium allows those organizations to extend their public name for private gain. For those who are developing Rich Content, the Web provides powerful and accessible tools that puts information gathering in the hands of the viewer. These organizations can extend their public information mission into a new medium that facilitates both public service and private use. For those who build Virtual Transaction sites, the Web offers an alternate distribution and sales channel that may enable the disenfranchised to bypass the capital-intensive traditional market structures. These organizations can build a public marketplace in which they transact private deals with their customers. 

The Virtual Communities examined in this study seem to provide companionship, information, and social support as predicted by Wellman and his colleagues (1996). As predicted more than 30 years ago by Licklider, Taylor & Herbert (1968), they also seem to be built around common interests rather than common geography. But can they substitute for or reconstitute a public sphere?The sites in this sample focus on personal interests rather than public ones. For most people, health is a personal concern.Issues of public health seem important only during times of medical crisis. Future research should examine other kinds of sites to determine if there are places in cyberspace that build and sustain communities that focus on issues of public life.

References

Boyte, Harry C. (1989). Overview: Rethinking politics.ö National Civic Review, July/August, 249-254.

Cerulo, Karen A. (1997). Reframing sociological concepts for a brave new (virtual?) world. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 48-58.

Finding opportunities in the chaotic online world: Internet and the health care industry. Healthcare Financial Management, 50 (7), 24.

Fisher, L. M. (1996).Health online: Doctor is in, and his disk is full. New York Times , June 24, (C)1.

Forderaro, L. (1995). Seekers of self-help finding it online. New York Times, March 23.

Fotsch, E. (1996). Finding opportunities in the chaotic online world: Internet and the health care industry. Healthcare Financial Management, 50 (7), 24.

Gross, N. (1999). Home sweet virtual home. Business Week, October 4, 200.

Grunig, J.E. & Grunig, L.A. (1989). Toward a theory of public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research. Public Relations Research Annual, 1, 27-63.

Habermas, Jurgen (1984). The theory of communicative action. Volume 1, Reason and Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy.Boston: Beacon Press.

Halal, William E. (1992). The information technology revolution. Futurist, 26 (4), 10-15.

Kassirer, J. P. (1995). The next transformation in the delivery of health care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 52-54.

Kiesler, Sara (1986). Thinking ahead: The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review, January/February, 46-59.

Larkin, M. (1996). Health information on-line. FDA Consumer, 30 (5), 21.

Licklider, J.C.R, Robert Taylor, and E. Herbert (1968). The computer as a communication device. International Science and Technology, April.

McMillan, S.J. (1998). Who pays for content? Funding in interactive media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(1). Available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue1/mcmillan.html

McMillan, S.J. (1999). Health communication and the Internet: Relationships between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content, and purpose. Health Communication, 11 (4), 375-390.

McMillan, S.J. & Kathryn B. Campbell (1996). ôOnline cities: Are they building a virtual public sphere or expanding consumption communities?ö Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention, Anaheim, CA, August 10-13.

McNeil, C. (1996). Marketing clinical trials on the Internet. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88, 14-35.

Meyer, H. (1996). Surfing the Net for a health plan. Hospitals & Health Networks, 70 (16), 37.

Moore, Carl M. (1991). Community is where community happens. National Civic Review, Fall, 352-357.

Orvell, B. (1995). The next transformation in the delivery of health care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 1099-1100.

Parks, L. (1999). Flurry of online specialists reshape drug store marketplace. Drug Store News, April 26, 75.

Pingree, S., Hawkins, R.P., Gustafson, D.H., Boberg, E., Bricker, E., Wise, M., Berhe, H., & Hsu, E. (1996). Will the disadvantaged ride the information highway? Hopeful answers from a computer-based health crisis system. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 331-353.

Rheingold, Howard (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Turkle, Sherry (1997). Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of the Freudian century. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 72-84.

Vaz, V. (1999, October).Wellness Web sites. Essence, 38.

Villalon, M. (1999, October).GIS and the Internet:Tools that add value to your health plan. Health Management Today, 16.

Virnoche, Mary E. & Gary T. Marx (1997).ôOnly connectö û E.M. Forster in an age of electronic communication: Computer-mediated association and community networks. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (1), 85-100.

Wellman, Barry, Janet Salaff, Dimitrina Dimitrova, Laura Garton, Milena Gulia, & Caroline Haythornthwaite (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.

Werner, C. (1996). Cyberspace marketing quickly gaining favor among manufacturers. Health Industry Today, 59 (7), 1.


Copyright 2001 Communication Institute for Online Scholarship, Inc.

This file may not be publicly distributed or reproduced without written permission of the Communication Institute for Online Scholarship, P.O. Box 57, Rotterdam Jct., NY 12150 USA (phone: 518-887-2443).


CIOS Support Staff
support@cios.org

Branch to CIOS home page