Persuasion header image
The Nature of Attitudes and Persuasion

The Yale Approach

Congruity Theory

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Social Judgment/ Involvement Theory

Information Integration Theory

Theory of Reasoned Action

Elaboration Likelihood Model

Home

Social Judgment/
Involvement
Theory

Social Judgment/Involvement Theory
The Nature of Social Judgment/Involvement Theory
Research on Social Judgment/Involvement Theory
Strengths and Weaknesses of Social Judgment/involvement Theory
Glossary
Further Readings
Self-Test

Research on Social Judgment/Involvement Theory
The discussions of Social Judgment/Involvement theory offer research in support of their discussions (
Sherif & Hovland, 1961; Sherif & Sherif, 1965, 1967). Other studies have found support for the curvilinear relationship between discrepancy and persuasion, although there are some exceptions (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). There has also been some support for the prediction that highly involved people are less susceptible to persuasion than those who are less involved (Johnson & Eagly, 1989; note that they distinguish between difference kinds of involvement, an idea discussed below, and support for Social Judgment/Involvement predictions are not supported for each kind of involvement).

<Previous Page | Next Page>