Persuasion header image
The Nature of Attitudes and Persuasion

The Yale Approach

Congruity Theory

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Social Judgment/ Involvement Theory

Information Integration Theory

Theory of Reasoned Action

Elaboration Likelihood Model

Home

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

Petty and Cacioppo's Elaboration Likelihood Model

Two "Routes" to Persuasion
Involvement and Cognitive Responses
Argument Quality
Argument Quantity
Source Factors
Evaluation of the ELM
Glossary
References
Self-Test
Argument Quality
Another factor that influences the kind of thoughts receivers have is argument quality or strength. Strong arguments have been consistently found to create more favorable thoughts, and fewer unfavorable thoughts, than weak arguments (Benoit, 1987; Petty & Cacioppo, 1984). Strong arguments, thus, have been found to be more persuasive than weak ones (Benoit, 1987; Cacioppo, Petty, & Morris, 1983; Petty, Cacioppo, & Goldman, 1981). Furthermore, the influence of argument quality is greater on involving than uninvolving topics (Andrews & Shimp, 1990; Petty & Cacioppo, 1984). So, persuaders can increase the likelihood that an audience will have favorable thoughts by working hard to include strong, high quality arguments in persuasive messages.

<Previous Page | Next Page>