Persuasion header image
The Nature of Attitudes and Persuasion

The Yale Approach

Congruity Theory

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Social Judgment/ Involvement Theory

Information Integration Theory

Theory of Reasoned Action

Elaboration Likelihood Model

Home

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

Petty and Cacioppo's Elaboration Likelihood Model

Two "Routes" to Persuasion
Involvement and Cognitive Responses
Argument Quality
Argument Quantity
Source Factors
Evaluation of the ELM
Glossary
References
Self-Test
Argument Quantity
Subjects exposed to a greater number of arguments should produce more favorable cognitive responses than subjects exposed to fewer arguments. Calder, Insko, and Yandell (1974) found that number of arguments influences cognitive responses. Furthermore, numerous studies have reported that messages with more arguments create more attitude change than those with fewer arguments (Calder, Insko, & Yandell, 1974; Chaiken, 1980; Petty & Cacioppo, 1984). Argument quantity, unlike argument quality or strength, is believed to be a peripheral cue. When receivers notice that a message has a large number of arguments, they have some tendency to accept the message.

<Previous Page | Next Page>