Your CIOS file request: Q-METHOD/02240163.436 hotline item

-
Received:  by CIOS Mailer; Wednesday 24 Feb 2010 16:34:36
Date:         Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:31:24 -0500
From:         "Jose A. Quiles" 
Subject: Re: Number of participants
To:           Q-METHOD@LISTSERV.KENT.EDU
List-Help: ,              
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Subscribe: 
List-Owner: 
List-Archive: 

--Boundary_(ID_hRFmrdlqiYbFdXj1k818Tg)
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

I cannot agree with you more, there indeed are plenty of Q primers, 
but I thought that the congestion would lessen if there is an 
authoritative Q-primer authored by you and other Q veterans (The 
operational term here is "authoritative").
Recalling Stephenson's complaint about dealing with requests for new 
introductions to Q-methodology is quite appropriate, your challenge 
is quite similar since you are the upmost authority on Q. Perhaps, 
there are no easy ways to avoid recurrent side-tracks in a fluid and 
growing use of Q-methodology.

Best, Jose Quiles 

--Boundary_(ID_hRFmrdlqiYbFdXj1k818Tg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



I cannot agree with you more, there indee=
d
are plenty of Q primers, but I thought that the congestion would lessen
if there is an authoritative Q-primer authored by you and other Q
veterans (The operational term here is "authoritative"). 

Recalling Stephenson=92s complaint about dealing with requests for new
introductions to Q-methodology is quite appropriate, your challenge is
quite similar since you are the upmost authority on Q. Perhaps, there are
no easy ways to avoid recurrent side-tracks in a fluid and growing use of
Q-methodology. 


Best, Jose Quiles


--Boundary_(ID_hRFmrdlqiYbFdXj1k818Tg)--