Communication Institute for Online Scholarship
Communication Institute for Online
Scholarship Continous online service and innovation
since 1986
Site index
 
ComAbstracts Visual Communication Concept Explorer Tables of Contents Electronic Journal of Communication ComVista

Your file request

Your CIOS file request: Q-METHOD/06189184.119 hotline item


-
Received:  by CIOS Mailer; Thursday 18 Jun 2009 18:41:19
Date:         Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:40:45 -0400
From:         "BROWN, STEVEN" 
Subject: Re: Learning strategies
To:           Q-METHOD@LISTSERV.KENT.EDU
List-Help: ,              
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Subscribe: 
List-Owner: 
List-Archive: 

--_000_C6603AAD7281sbrownkentedu_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


I'm not sure whether the study referenced below belongs in the first or sec=
ond of Roland Arter's categories, but it does begin with Dewey's conception=
 of "collateral learning" and makes a pitch for a "collateral methodology,"=
 like Q, that could access such collateral learnings:

Brown, C.L., & Brown, S.R. (1981).  The subjective environment of learning.=
  Baylor Educator, 6(1), 2-5.

n their language arts program involving English, writing, spelling, and rea=
ding.  The factors that emerged at time-1 included a bipolar first factor, =
with the Enthusiasts at one end, who embraced the following statements:

I like writing, I think it's fun.
I like English, I learn something and it's fun.
Reading is very interesting and I learn a lot.
Etc.

The Enthusiasts liked everything about school.  At the opposite pole were t=
he Antagonists:

I don't like to have to learn to spell new words.
I hate English; it gets to me.
Reading is a waste of time.
I think spelling is boring.
Etc.

Students labeled the Detached comprised the second factor:

I like to read sometimes when I don't have anything else to do.
Sometimes I like handwriting and sometimes I don't; it depends on what mood=
 I'm in.
Writing is so-so; writing is dull.

Spelling was the one subject matter which was spared these students' apathy=
.  These children were experiencing difficulties at home, and so it was onl=
y when things were going well in their lives that they could find interest =
in their studies.  That is, it depended on "what mood I'm in."

The Manualists (as factor 3 was labeled) found interest in manual and rote =
skills (such as spelling and handwriting), but were disinterested in more i=
ntellectual and cognitive pursuits (such as English and reading):

I like writing; it is fun.
Handwriting is one of my favorite subjects.
I like spelling because it helps me learn new words; then it's like a puzzl=
e: it all fits in.
Reading is not very interesting to me.

These statements all came from the students themselves.  At time-2, followi=
ng changes to the language arts program, some of the students changed facto=
r type.  This was induced, in part, by the pairing of some students from on=
e factor with students from another factor, to see if the peer group might =
have an influence on the Antagonists in particular.  This turned out to be =
a two-edged sword:  Some of the Antagonists became more accepting in the se=
nse that they exchanged antagonism for detachment; however, the Enthusiasts=
 also lost some of their zest by virtue, apparently, of having been paired =
with Antagonists.  Knowledge of the Q factors also influenced the way in wh=
ich the teachers related to the students.
___________________________________________
*  _____  ______  ____  __ __  ____  ___ _  *  Steven R. Brown
| |  ___||_    _||  _ ||  |  ||  _ ||   | | |  Political Science
| |___  |  |  |  |  _| |  |  ||  _| |     | |  Kent State University
| |_____|  |__|  |____| \___/ |____||_|___| |  (sbrown@kent.edu)
*___________________________________________*_________________________
News break: Suicidal schizophrenic twin kills sister by mistake.







On 6/18/09 12:17 PM, "Roland Arter"  wrote:

Michael,

From what I've been able to gather most literature about learning processes=
 seems to fall into two major areas.  Dewey, Piaget and Vygotsky, to name a=
 famous few, address learning processes and how they develop, mostly during=
 childhood development.  The other area seems to address learner subjectivi=
ty - the way learners' perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, desires, culture, r=
eligion, etc., affect how they learn.  Schommer, Muis and Dweck are a few r=
esearchers that address these issues.

The second area lends itself to Q-methodology.  (Ramlo is currently working=
 in this area and actually uses Q-methodology to evaluate learning.)  So fa=
r I haven't found many Q studies that deal directly with learner subjectivi=
ty and how it impacts learning.  Not learning development.  Learning subjec=
tivity.  Not what learners can do.  What do learners want to do to, and why=
 do they want to do it from their standpoint of view.  Learning doesn't beg=
in until the learner decides it does, not the teacher.

First, I hope this sheds some light on your comments.  Second, if anyone ha=
s any information about Q studies, or any studies that focus on learner (st=
udent) subjectivity, please forward this information to me at arter@uakron.=
edu.  I am developing my dissertation.

Roland

--_000_C6603AAD7281sbrownkentedu_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Re: Learning strategies



I’m not sure whether the study referenced below belongs in the first = or second of Roland Arter’s categories, but it does begin with Dewey&= #8217;s conception of “collateral learning” and makes a pitch f= or a “collateral methodology,” like Q, that could access such c= ollateral learnings:

Brown, C.L., & Brown, S.R. (1981). &nbs= p;The subjective environment of learning.  Baylor Educator, 6(1= ), 2-5.
I like writing, I think it’s fun. &nb= sp;
I like English, I learn something and it’s fun.  
Reading is very interesting and I learn a lot.  
Etc.
I don’t like to have to learn to spel= l new words.
I hate English; it gets to me.
Reading is a waste of time.
I think spelling is boring.
Etc.
I like to read sometimes when I don’t= have anything else to do.
Sometimes I like handwriting and sometimes I don’t; it depends on wha= t mood I’m in.
Writing is so-so; writing is dull.
I like writing; it is fun.
Handwriting is one of my favorite subjects.
I like spelling because it helps me learn new words; then it’s like a= puzzle: it all fits in.
Reading is not very interesting to me.
___________________________________________
*=A0 _____=A0 ______=A0 ____=A0 __ __=A0 ____=A0 ___ _=A0 *=A0
Steven R. Brown
| |=A0 ___||_=A0=A0=A0 _||=A0 _ ||=A0 |= =A0 ||=A0 _ ||=A0=A0 | | |=A0 Political Science=
| |___=A0 |=A0 | =A0|=A0 | =A0_| |=A0 | = =A0||=A0 _| |=A0=A0=A0=A0 | |=A0 Kent State Uni= versity
| |_____|=A0 |__|=A0 |____| \___/ |____||= _|___| |=A0=A0(sbro= wn@kent.edu)
*________________________________________= ___*_________________________
News break: Suicidal schizophrenic tw= in kills sister by mistake.







On 6/18/09 12:17 PM, "Roland Arter" <rarter@OH.RR.COM> wrote:

Michael,

From what I’ve been able to gather most literature about learning pro= cesses seems to fall into two major areas.  Dewey, Piaget and Vygotsky= , to name a famous few, address learning processes and how they develop, mo= stly during childhood development.  The other area seems to address le= arner subjectivity – the way learners’ perceptions, attitudes, = beliefs, desires, culture, religion, etc., affect how they learn.  Sch= ommer, Muis and Dweck are a few researchers that address these issues. &nbs= p;

The second area lends itself to Q-methodology.  (Ramlo is currently wo= rking in this area and actually uses Q-methodology to evaluate learning.) &= nbsp;So far I haven’t found many Q studies that deal directly with le= arner subjectivity and how it impacts learning.  Not learning developm= ent.  Learning subjectivity.  Not what learners can do. &n= bsp;What do learners want to do to, and why do they want to do it fr= om their standpoint of view.  Learning doesn’t begin until the l= earner decides it does, not the teacher.

First, I hope this sheds some light on your comments.  Second, if anyo= ne has any information about Q studies, or any studies that focus on learne= r (student) subjectivity, please forward this information to me at arter@uakron.edu.  I am developing my disser= tation.

Roland
--_000_C6603AAD7281sbrownkentedu_--