Your file request
Your CIOS file request: ETHNO/05260043.806 hotline item
-
Received: by CIOS Mailer; Wednesday 26 May 2010 04:38:06
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:48 -0400
To: "Multiple recipients of ETHNO"
From: markku.haakana at helsinki.fi
Subject: [CIOS/ethno] A new volume on CA: Talk in interaction. Comparative Dimensions
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
**********A new book on conversation analysis*********
Talk in Interaction
Comparative Dimensions
Edited by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso & Jan Lindstr=F6m.
Published by Finnish Literature Society (SKS), 2009.
During the recent decades Conversation Analysis has developed into a
distinctive method for analyzing talk in interaction. The method is=20
utilized
in several disciplines sharing an interest in social interaction, like=20
anthropology,
linguistics, social psychology, and sociology, and it has been applied=20
to a great
variety of languages and types of interaction. Conversation Analysis
then is coming of age as a truly comparative enterprise.
This volume presents and discusses comparative approaches to analyzing
interactional practices and structures. The contributors to the volume ha=
ve
their background in sociology, linguistics, and logopedics. They offer=20
comparative
analyses of activity types, participant roles and identities, displays=20
of emotion, and
design of actions such as questions and corrections. The languages covere=
d
by the chapters include English, Finnish, German, and Swedish.
The volume is of interest to all those interested in the research of=20
language and
social interaction. Because of its methodological nature, the book can=20
also be
utilized in teaching and in learning the discovery procedures typical of=20
Conversation
Analysis.The volume can be purchased through Amazon.co or the publisher=92=
s
internet store (www.finlit.fi =3D> sks books).
Contents
Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso & Jan Lindstr=F6m
Introduction: Comparative dimension of talk in interaction
Ilkka Arminen
On comparative methodology in studies of social interaction
Paul Drew
=93Quit talking while I=92m interrupting=94:
A comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation
Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
A sequential approach to affect: The case of =91disappointment=92
Auli Hakulinen & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Designing utterances for action: Verb repeat responses to assessments
Markku Haakana & Salla Kurhila
Other-correction in everyday conversation: some comparative aspects
Jan Lindstr=F6m & Camilla Lindholm
=91 May I ask=92: Question frames in institutional interaction
Johanna Ruusuvuori & Liisa Voutilainen
Comparing affiliating responses to troubles-tellings
in different types of health care encounters
Helena Kangasharju
Preference for disagreement? A comparison of three disputes
Sara Routarinne
Uptake makes a difference
Comparing evaluation uptake in two learning environments
Minna Laakso & Tuula Tykkyl=E4inen
Gendered practices of negotiation?
Comparing girls and boys=92 practices of making proposals in same-sex pee=
r=20
play
Steven E.Clayman & John Heritage
Question design as a comparative and historical
window into president-press relations
----------------
For information about participating in this conference, send
SHOW HOTLINES by itself in the body of email addressed to:
Comserve at CIOS.ORG
|