Issues 2, 3, 4 (Volume 9) of the
Electronic Journal of Communication contain articles which exemplify the
uses of the Sense-Making Methodology which has been under development by
Brenda Dervin and colleagues for the past 27 years. In contrast to most
uses of the term methodology which either use the term synonymously with
method or elide it into meta-theory, Sense-Making has been developed as
an explicit attempt to be methodological -- i.e. to provide
philosophically driven guidance for a coherent set of guiding methods
for theorizing, observing, listening, analyzing, and concluding relevant
to any communication practice, including research practice.
Sense-Making incorporates an
elaborate set of meta-theoretic assumptions, methodological premises,
and specific tools including a variety of interviewing and coding
approaches and a communication-as-procedure perspective which can
potentially guide all research phases. Developed explicitly as a
methodology between the cracks, Sense-Making has been designed to stand
between artificial polarizations (e.g., qualitative versus quantitative,
deductive versus inductive, prediction versus explanation, theoretic
versus applied, contextual versus generalizable).
The 19 articles in these three
issues are diverse in their literature roots and their implementations.
Some are qualitative, some quantitative; some use text analysis, others
content analysis, others statistical analysis. Some have large samples,
some small. Some rely entirely on phone surveys; others include
observation and ethnographic field work. Some use Sense-Making
primarily as method; others use it as a meta-perspective guiding
virtually every aspect of their research step-takings. The articles
consist of one introduction by Dervin & Clark and 18 exemplar
studies.
The studies are divided into five areas based on the
substantive discourses from which they arise.
Public Communication
Campaign Audience Research:
Five articles which interrogate traditional approaches to public
communication campaigns and research and/or provide exemplars of the use
of Sense-Making as a tool for understanding audiences. Foci include
adolescent sense-making of anti-smoking messages (Frenette);
pregnant drug-addicted women and their information needs (Dervin,
Harpring & Foreman-Wernet); householder sense-making of
environmental messages (Madden); adult sense-making relating to
HIV/AIDS (Brendlinger, Dervin & Foreman-Wernet); and,
meanings for wilderness (Murphy).
Media Studies, Mass
Communication, and New Technologies.
Six articles which focus on practitioner encodings and audience
decodings of mediated messages. The set includes studies of: how
broadcasters running Bolivian tin miner radio stations conceptualize and
respond to difference (Huesca); the realization of the
empowerment vision by volunteer public access cable television producers
(Higgins); decoding of advertisements of idealized female bodies
by male and female audience members (Shields); audience
interpretations of television news (Dworkin, Foreman-Wernet, &
Dervin); sense-making of leisure time information in response to
newspaper reading versus in actual life situations (Spirek, Dervin,
Nilan, & Martin); and sense-making uses of an electronic
discussion group (Schaefer).
Information Needs, Seeking, and
Use in Context: Two studies
which use Sense-Making as tool for advancing theorizing of information
seeking and use, focusing on: structural arrangements versus
information seeking agency as predictors of information seeking and use
(Nilan & Dervin); and the use of Sense-Making to define
information need situations and a beginning exploration of situation
versus professional domain as predictors of information seeking and use
(Cheuk & Dervin).
Health Communication and Information Seeking: Three
articles which focus on health care contexts, including: a report on
the lived experience of one young chronically ill patient
(Cardillo); a study of reflective thinking as a method of
learning from the complexities of practice by nurses (Teekman);
and a study of the quality of cancer information services to cancer
patients, drawing on interviews with patients and practitioners
(Nelissen, van Eden, & Maas).
Religious Communication
Studies: Two articles which
focus in different ways on religious critique and reinvention: one
describes how and why Catholic informants negotiate dissonant situations
relating to their Catholic faith (Coco); the other applies a
Sense-Making derived communication-as-procedure analytic to study
feminist small group processes (Clark).
Kathleen D. Clark
The University of Akron
Akron, Ohio
USA
kclark@uakron.edu